The "I'm Your Advocate"
Era Is Over

← All Insights

Something has shifted in how the best SaaS companies think about Customer Success — and it's not subtle. The teams delivering real retention, meaningful expansion, and referenceable customers aren't built around advocates. They're built around strategic partners. The distinction sounds like semantics until you watch it play out. Then it's obvious.

For years, Customer Success was sold on a promise: "I'm your advocate. I'm in your corner. I've got you." It felt good, built rapport. And it fundamentally undersold what the role should be.

Advocacy is a reactive posture

Advocacy positions the CSM as a liaison: someone who carries messages between the client and the company, shows up to QBRs with a deck full of usage stats, and escalates tickets when things go sideways. That's not customer success. That's babysitting.

The clients winning right now — those expanding, those referenceable, those who genuinely can't imagine not renewing — they don't have advocates. They have strategic partners. I've watched that distinction play out enough times to know it isn't subtle.

The clients I've seen succeed long-term didn't get there because their CSM was responsive and likable. They got there because someone showed up already knowing what they needed — before they asked. Someone connected what the product does to what the business is actually trying to achieve. Not in theory. In revenue, efficiency, and competitive advantage.

The difference in practice

There's a real difference between the two modes, and it shows up in every interaction:

I was writing a job description recently for a Senior CSM, and I kept coming back to one question: What would make a client feel like they hired a team of experts, not just a SaaS subscription?

The answer wasn't better check-in cadences or prettier QBR decks. It was CSMs who show up as peers — who have a point of view, who know the client's business. Not just their usage data. Their actual business:

"What would make a client feel like they hired a team of experts, not just a SaaS subscription?"

When I looked at it honestly, I realized I was describing a fundamentally different job than what most CS teams are recruiting for, training for, and measuring for.

Playing chess, not checkers

The best CSMs I've seen operate like chess players. They're not responding to the board in front of them. They're playing two or three moves ahead, anticipating where the client is going and positioning them to win before the problem even surfaces.

That requires deep preparation, genuine curiosity about the client's world, and the confidence to walk into an executive conversation and say something they didn't already know — and have them lean in. It also requires the organizational support to make it possible: the right data, the right tools, the right incentive structure, and a hiring bar that reflects what the role actually demands.

Most CS organizations aren't there yet. They're still hiring for responsiveness and likability, measuring for activity and NPS, and wondering why their GRR keeps eroding. The answer is usually sitting in the job description.

The question worth asking

If your CSMs are still leading with "I'm your advocate," it's worth asking: Advocate for what, exactly?

Because the clients who need an advocate have already started looking for a new vendor. The clients who need a strategic partner? They're sticking around — and growing.

Andrea Mulligan is a B2B SaaS executive and advisor with 30 years of experience building Customer Success, Professional Services, and GTM organizations. She works with growth-stage companies on CS transformation, AI operationalization, and post-sale strategy. Start a conversation →